Terry Mitchell

Mercy for All or Mercy for None



Posted: Thursday, November 20, 2008

by
http://commenterry.blogs.com

The other day, one of the local TV stations ran a news story about a young woman who was rescued from a creek by a police officer as she was about to drown. The woman had accidentally run her car out of the road and into the nearby creek as the officer observed from a short distance.

No mention was made about the officer giving her a ticket for reckless driving. I can only assume that he didn't. To most people myself included that would have been a cruel thing to do, even though, by the book, he would have had every right to. A family member told me that it was outrageous for me to even verbally suggest such a possibility. The whole point was that mercy was completely appropriate in this case. I agree, but why isn't it applicable in all cases in which people accidentally run their vehicles out of the road?

I have little double that this officer, like most traffic cops, had given tickets to numerous drivers for running out of the road. Generally, police operate under the automatic assumption that a driver was being reckless due to the mere fact that he or she ran out of the road. While I agree with the application of mercy in this case, I disagree with the lack thereof in similar cases. I would even take it a step further and say that mercy should be extended to drivers for all accidents in which they were not obviously and overtly driving in a reckless manner.

Obviously, this concept should be applied to situations other than just those involving driving. If mercy is shown to one person for a given shortcoming or misdeed, it should be shown to all for similar shortcomings or misdeeds. In my opinion, selective mercy perverts the whole notion of mercy. The Bible says God reserves the right to have mercy on whom He will. However, we are not God and therefore do not have this right.

Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, amateur political analyst, and blogger from Virginia, USA. He posts a least one article a day to his blog - http://commenterry.blogs.com - on subjects such as current events, politics, technology, society and culture, religion, health and well-being, self improvement, personal finance, trivia, and sports. Terry is also the owner and operator of a website that is dedicated to allowing U.S. citizens to find all types of insurance at reasonable prices.  
 
This Article has been viewed 158 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)
» left by Jennifer Cuddy
 3 years 62 days ago.
Well, the law would have stepped in had it been proven that she were driving under the influence, not merely having her car slip on a sheet of ice, etc..
 
In cases where the driver is under the influence or speeding outrageously enough to have hurt others, or where even when the driver by other negligence imposes harm to another, then these are matters of Civil law. Breaches of Civil Law, or Torts, are the basis of Civil Litigation. Sometimes there are breaches of both Criminal Law and Civil Law, in which case, there may be both prison sentences and monetary punishments.
» left by Terry Mitchell 3 years 62 days ago.
89 fans.
Jennifer, I wasn't including people who drive drunk or negligently. I'm talking about simple slip-ups that even good drivers can have once in a while.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.