How Laws Are Inconsistent About Debt
Posted: Friday, January 08, 2010
by Terry Mitchell
http://commenterry.blogs.com
If you were to go into a restaurant and eat a meal and then intentionally walk out without paying, would you be in danger of being convicted of a crime? Absolutely. If you were to stay at a hotel and then deliberately leave without paying the tab, would you be putting yourself at risk of being arrested? Of course you would (if you don't believe it, ask actor Randy Quaid and his wife, Evi, who were recently picked up by the police for just such an offense).
I've often wondered why this is the case. To me, refusing to pay for goods and/or services one has received is the same as stealing. So why is stealing food from a restaurant or services from a hotel considered a criminal act to be investigated by law enforcement, while stealing furniture from a store or money from a credit card company viewed as a civil matter for the store or credit card company to pursue? This is a complete inconsistency in the law. It doesn't make sense and it's not fair.
This Article has been viewed 183 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.