Should We Limit the Number of Debate Participants?
Posted: Monday, September 19, 2011
by Terry Mitchell
http://commenterry.blogs.com
Here we go again! We now have Bill O’Reilly calling for the number of candidates at the GOP debates to be limited to the two or three frontrunners. He claims that the others are just a “distraction.” That’s a ludicrous notion, but it comes up during every presidential campaign cycle, without fail. Before a single vote is cast in a primary or caucus, people are wanting to eliminate candidates for a party’s presidential nomination.
Look at what has happened to current GOP presidential candidates like Gary Johnson, Buddy Roemer, and Thaddeus McCotter. I’ll lay odds that most potential GOP primary and caucus voters don’t even know these guys are running. Instead of cutting back on the number of candidates that have been participating in the debates thus far, these gentlemen should be allowed in to participate as well. If any of the others, such as Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, or Jon Huntsman, had been excluded from the previous debates, I doubt that anyone would know that they were running either.
It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. It’s a catch-22. Someone is not doing well enough in the polls in order to qualify for the debates. By not being allowed to participate in the debates, they have no chance to boost their poll numbers. So at this point in the game, I say the more the merrier. Forget about that foolishness that calls for focusing only on the frontrunners. Debate organizers should not allow polls and media bullies such as O’Reilly to dictate who can and can’t participate in their forums.
By the way, most of the U.S. media is now calling the GOP presidential contest a two-man race. I have two questions: Why are they calling Michele Bachmann a “man” and who is the other candidate they are referring to? If they believe it’s a two man race between Rick Perry and Mitt Romney, they need to think again. Sure, they are two at the top of the top of the polls right now, but for how long? Perry could well be just the flavor of the month, and Romney’s credentials with conservative GOP primary voters is questionable at best.
This Article has been viewed 298 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)I agree--basically, the more the merrier at this point.Steve, thanks for reading and commenting ... and I'm glad you agree.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.

