Do Tougher Sentences Mean Less Crime?
Posted: Friday, September 30, 2011
by Terry Mitchell
http://commenterry.blogs.com
Some people, especially politicians running for office, are always advocating tougher sentences for criminals as a means of reducing crime. But do tougher sentences really result in less crime? I don’t see any such evidence. In fact, many European countries hand out much lighter sentences to criminals than does the United States, yet most of them are not plagued by nearly as much violent crime.
Conversely, the U.S. has one of highest violent crime rates in the world. And that is in spite of the fact that many states, along with the federal government, utilize the death penalty for certain types of murder. In the states that don’t use the death penalty, those types of murders are often punishable by life in prison without the possibility of parole. Other violent crimes such as rape and aggravated assault are sometimes punished with life sentences as well, or multi-year sentences which often amount to life sentences. Even non-violent criminals in the U.S. sometimes spend the rest of their natural life behind bars.
There are a lot of factors that contribute to the reduction of (or increase in) crime. Obviously, the tougher sentences could not possibly be the only factor. The facts described above make that perfectly clear. Politicians and other demagogues should stop acting as if it is some kind of magic bullet. And their listeners should start rejecting that claptrap.
This Article has been viewed 300 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)Good to have you back in the saddle and injecting both a heart and a head to the fray. Clarity and Spirit.Christofer, thanks for being a consistent reader. It is greatly appreciated. :-)
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.

