Terry Mitchell

Komen Foundation Kowtowed to Pro-Abortion Lobby



Posted: Friday, February 10, 2012

by Terry Mitchell
http://commenterry.blogs.com

I was very disappointed when I heard that the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation reversed course and decided to continue its funding of Planned Parenthood. This decision came just days after it had announced that it would no longer provide financial support to Planned Parenthood.  The Komen foundation had come under intense pressure from many pro-abortion groups and the liberal mainstream media, shortly after making their original announcement. Their sudden reversal was obviously an effort to appease these groups and therefore end the controversy.

But if the leadership of the Komen foundation thinks that things will now go back to normal, it is sadly mistaken. Komen has done a lot of wonderful work over the years to help to fight the awful plague of breast cancer. However, I doubt that, until recently, many people knew that their donations to this organization were helping fund an entity that is primarily known for providing abortions. Now that this has been revealed, and considering the fact that Komen refused to stand up to the pro-abortion lobby, look for its revenue to take a hit.

I for one will no longer consider Komen for any of my charitable contributions, nor will I be willing to participate in any of their fundraising events. There are plenty of other organizations that fight cancer without adding to the shameful number of fetuses that are aborted each year in this country. Would you donate your hard-earned money to an organization that fights heart disease but also funds a child sex slavery ring? I didn’t think so. Neither will I donate to a cancer-fighting association that funds an abortion provider.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, amateur political analyst, and blogger from Virginia, USA. He posts a least one article a day to his blog - http://commenterry.blogs.com - on subjects such as current events, politics, technology, society and culture, religion, health and well-being, self improvement, personal finance, trivia, and sports. He is also the owner of a new privacy-enhanced search engine - http://www.SearchMost.com.

This Article has been viewed 240 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (2 total)
» left by Marijo Phelps
87 days 10 hours ago.
142 fans.
I was disappointed also and even though I am now a breast cancer survivor will not be donating to them. I could have been an abortion statistic but my mom decided to NOT abort me - obviously this issue is near and dear to my heart.
» left by Terry Mitchell 86 days 20 hours ago.
91 fans.
Marijo, I think you speak for the majority of conservative women in this country. Thanks for reading and commenting.
» left by Jean Horst
87 days 5 hours ago.
178 fans.
I think you've way over simplified what is really going on here and your article is overly dismissive of what is a very real problem in the US. In spite of what a lot of men think, this really was not about abortion at all in the minds of the women who have gotten free/low cost, life-saving cancer screenings from Planned Parenthood via the Komen Foundation grants.

In this country, there is no national clinic system for women's health that compares with PP. I am not a supporter of theirs and I believe that abortion should be avoided if at all possible. Most women do not receive adequate information before receiving an abortion and much of the blame lies with Planned Parenthood. Having said that, it is also true, that only 3% of what PP does involves abortions. The rest of what they do is to provide healthcare for women who are low income, uninsured/uninsurable. If we want to defund Planned Parenthood, then we must come up with a viable alternative.

The Komen Foundation is a breast cancer prevention/cure foundation first and foremost; what they recognized is that there is no alternative to what Planned Parenthood does for women.

The outrage over the defunding was not primarily from abortion rights activists, if was from women who have mothers, sisters, daughters, friends, etc who received a free mammogram from a PP clinic and it saved their life.

We simply cannot afford to lose this system - yet. You're a man, you have a lot of money, you can afford to be dismissive of PP. I'm a woman, I have friends who lost their lives because they couldn't get healthcare and waited too long to get screenings. They should have gone to PP for free ones but didn't because their churches told them it was an evil place, I don't want to lose any more, I can't afford it. If you don't like it, replace it, otherwise you're just throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Many more will die of cancer needlessly.

Komen didn't kowtow to the abortion lobby, they kowtowed to the women they have claimed is their first priority to serve, as they should have.
» left by Terry Mitchell 86 days 5 hours ago.
91 fans.
Jean, I'm sure you know what you are talking about. As a two-time cancer surviver myself, I obviously do not want anyone to die of cancer needlessly (even though I am a man and "have a lot of money"). However, it sounds like Planned Parenthood has an identity problem. Perhaps if they changed their name to something like, let's say "Women's Preventative Health Services", and spun off the Planned Parenthood name into another organization that only did abortion and birth control, the perception of them would change.
» left by Jean Horst 85 days 2 hours ago.
178 fans.
I think you've hit the nail on the head, Terry, that's a great idea.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.